Skip to content

revert: temporarily undo Locker-specific logic @W-17769475#5198

Merged
wjhsf merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
wjh/revert-locker-check
Feb 6, 2025
Merged

revert: temporarily undo Locker-specific logic @W-17769475#5198
wjhsf merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
wjh/revert-locker-check

Conversation

@wjhsf
Copy link
Contributor

@wjhsf wjhsf commented Feb 6, 2025

Details

Reverts #5136 #5163.

Does this pull request introduce a breaking change?

  • 😮‍💨 No, it does not introduce a breaking change.
  • 💔 Yes, it does introduce a breaking change.

Does this pull request introduce an observable change?

  • 🤞 No, it does not introduce an observable change.
  • 🔬 Yes, it does include an observable change.

GUS work item

@wjhsf wjhsf requested a review from a team as a code owner February 6, 2025 21:09
@jye-sf jye-sf self-requested a review February 6, 2025 21:20
Copy link
Contributor

@jye-sf jye-sf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are all the other changes in those commits not needed to be reverted?

@wjhsf
Copy link
Contributor Author

wjhsf commented Feb 6, 2025

Are all the other changes in those commits not needed to be reverted?

No, they're just adding a flag. If we don't use the flag, nothing bad will happen.

@wjhsf
Copy link
Contributor Author

wjhsf commented Feb 6, 2025

Oh wait, the tests tho. 🤦

@wjhsf wjhsf enabled auto-merge (squash) February 6, 2025 21:40
@wjhsf wjhsf merged commit 76fda8a into master Feb 6, 2025
11 checks passed
@wjhsf wjhsf deleted the wjh/revert-locker-check branch February 6, 2025 21:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants